SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 932

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BALRAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Balram ……Petitioner(s)

Versus State of Haryana ……Respondent(s)

Decided on : 30.01.2026 Date of uploading: 30.01.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Rana, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Mahima Yashpal Singla, Senior DAG, Haryana.

*****

SUMEET GOEL, J. (Oral)

1. Present petition is the second attempt filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter to be referred as ‘the BNSS’) for grant of pre-arrest/anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.185 dated 11.08.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(3), 115(2), 324(2), 333, 351(3), 238(c) of BNS 2023 and Section 25(1-B), (a) of the Arms Act, at Police Station Sadar Palwal, District Palwal.

2. The gravamen of the FIR in question reflects that the present FIR was registered at the instance of the registered complainant Rajesh son of Late Girraj, who in his complaint had stated that on 10.08.2025 at about 4:20 PM, the petitioner (herein) alongwith Ravinder son of Santram, Manish (brother-in-law of Ravinder), along with three other persons, came to his house in a white-coloured B

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top