IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (115 Date of Decision:-29.01.2026 SURESH KUMAR … Appellant Versus KHARGA RAM AND OTHERS ... Respondent ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. By way of the present Regular Second Appeal (hereinafter referred to as “RSA”) the appellant–defendant has approached this Court, seeking to impugn and set aside the judgment and decree dated 25.04.2023 rendered by the learned Additional District Judge, Narnaul, whereby the judgment and decree dated 21.2.2016 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kanina was affirmed. The learned trial Court had decreed the suit filed by the respondents–plaintiff, directing possession of the suit property by way of partition. The appellant has challenged the concurrent findings of the Courts below on the grounds that the same are manifestly erroneous, legally unsustainable, and bereft of evidentiary support.

2. On a meticulous consideration of the factual matrix as articulated in the plaint, the case of the plaintiff stands delineated with precise clarity, and may be succinctly summa