SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1000

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARSHARANJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on : 13.01.2026 Decided on : 29.01.2026 Harsharanjit Singh ..... Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab & Anr.

..... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Argued by : Mr. Dhirinder Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General Punjab.

Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh, Advocate for the respondent No.2.

*****

SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J.

1. An application moved by the petitioner, who is facing a trial for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 307, 336, 323, 506, 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of Arms Act, vide FIR No.19 dated 21.01.2020, Police Station City Sangrur, has been dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Sangrur, hereinafter being referred to as ‘trial Court’ only, by virtue of order dated 22.11.2024.

2. Aggrieved of the abovementioned order dated 22.11.2024, hereinafter being referred to as ‘impugned order’, the present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner/accused, hereinafter being referred to as ‘petitioner’ only.

3. Briefly stating the facts emerging from record are that while facing trial for the commission of abovementioned offence,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top