IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
IQBAL SINGH – Respondent
##PAGE1##
FAO No. 3185 of 2001
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO No. 3185 of 2001(O&M)
Date of decision: 29.01.2026
Rajinder Singh & Ors.
…Appellants
Versus
Iqbal Singh & Ors.
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:- Mr. A.S. Kalsy, Advocate
For the appellants.
Mr. Sandeep Saini, Advocate
For respondent No.3 National Insurance Company Ltd.
***
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.
The present appeal has been preferred by the claimants assailing the
award dated 22.05.2001 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
Patiala, limited to the question of inadequacy of compensation.
2. The facts are not in dispute. Surinder Pal Singh, aged about 22 years
and unmarried, lost his life in a motor vehicular accident, which occurred on
02.07.1998 due to rash and negligent driving of truck bearing registration No.
PB-11-H-7605. The mother of the deceased had predeceased him. A claim
petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 was filed by his
father Rajinder Singh, brother, widowed sister-in-law (Bhabhi) and minor
nephews, asserting themselves to be legal representatives and dependents of
the deceased.
3. The learned Tribunal recorded a finding that there was no cogent
evidence regarding the income of the deceased. It further held that the brother,
sister-in-law and minor nephews could not be treated as dependents and that
no evidence of dependency was led by them. On that premise, the Tribunal
confined the compensation to a sum of ₹50,000/- under no-fault liability,
Page N: 1 of 4
1 of 4
::: Downloaded on - 03-02-2026 20:07:05 :::
##PAGE2##FAO No. 3185 of 2001
payable jointly and severally by the driver, owner and insurer of the offending
vehicle.
4. Learned counsel for the appellants has assailed the award on the
ground that the learned Tribunal fell into a serious error in law by restricting
compensation to no-fault liability merely on the ground that dependency was
not proved. It is contended that under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act,
the right to claim compensation vests in the “legal representatives” of the
deceased and not merely in dependents. Reliance has been placed on the
judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in National Insurance Company Limited
v. Birender & Ors. 2020 AIR (SC) 434 to submit that even non-dependent legal
representatives are entitled to maintain a claim petition and seek compensation
as per law.
5. Learned counsel further submits that even assuming that the
brother, sister-in-law and nephews may not qualify as dependents, the father of
the deceased, namely Rajinder Singh, unquestionably falls within the expression
“legal representative” and is entitled to compensation determined under
Section 166 of the Act and not confined to no-fault liability.
6. Learned counsel for the Insurance Company could not dispute the
legal position that the father of the deceased is a legal representative within the
meaning of Section 166 of the Act and is entitled to compensation to be
computed in accordance with settled principles.
7. In view of the above, this Court holds that appellant Rajinder Singh,
father of the deceased, is entitled to compensation as a legal representative of
the deceased Surinder Pal Singh. The approach adopted by the Tribunal in
restricting compensation to no-fault liability is legally unsustainable.
8. Coming to the determination of quantum, the deceased was
admittedly 22 years of age and unmarried. The educational qualifications of the
deceased stand established on record. He had passed B.A. (Hons.) in Economics
from Punjabi University, Patiala and had also cleared Master of Journalism and
Mass Communication (Part-I), with Part-II remaining. The income was pleaded to
Page N: 2 of 4
2 of 4
::: Downloaded on - 03-02-2026 20:07:05 :::
##PAGE3##FAO No. 3185 of 2001
be ₹4,000/- per month, however, no documentary evidence was produced to
substantiate the same.
9. PW-5 Gurinder Pal Singh deposed that the deceased worked as an
Insurance Agent under him and earned commission of about ₹1,500/- over a
period of 7-8 months. In
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.