SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1029

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PRITPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER APPEALS AND ORS – Respondent


2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that he does not press the present writ petition as regards the challenge to the remand order dated 06.11.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by the learned Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab, is concerned; however, he prays that the learned Collector, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, may be directed to decide the remanded case in a time bound manner and without being influenced by any observations made by learned Financial Commissioner (Appeals), Punjab, in the aforesaid order (Annexure P-1).

3. At this stage, Mr. Harpreet Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, appears on behalf of the respondent-State, in pursuance of the advance copy of paper book having already been supplied to him, and does not oppose the aforesaid course of action.

4. Keeping in view the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, since the matter relating to the appointment of Lambardar of Village Karimpur, Nawanshahr, Tehsil and District Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, has been pending for almost three years, the learned Collector, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, is directed to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top