SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1030

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BINDUSAR KADIAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Serial No.136 CWP-2116-2026 Decided on:28.01.2026 Bindusar Kadian . . . Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Amanpriye Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.

Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

Mr. Kanwal Goyal, Advocate and Ms. Sheena Dahiya, Advocate for respondent no.2.

TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J.(ORAL)

The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari setting aside the screening test result, dated 13.01.2026, Annexure P-3, for the post of PGT (English) pursuant to advertisement 22 of 2024, and allow the petitioner to participate in the next stage of selection, i.e., Subject Knowledge Test, to be held on 01.02.2026.

2. Learned counsel contended that the petitioner applied for the post in question as Ex-Serviceman (ESM) by filling up the application, Annexure P-2, and by mistake mentioned his ‘applicable category’ as per Clause

11(ix)(B)(ii) of the advertisement, which reads as under:

ii) where an ex-servicemen who herself/himself is eligible to avail the benefit of reservation under these instructions but she/he does n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top