SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1042

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SEEMA RANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent


206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***

CWP-19480-2015 Date of Decision: 03.02.2026 Seema Rani …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana And Others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL.

Present:- Mr. Rajiv Sharma (Hisarwale), Advocate with Mr. Shubham Chauhan, Advocate, Ms. Indubala Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Amrit Kashyap, Advocate for petitioner Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG, Haryana ***

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to promote her as Head Constable w.e.f. 28.12.2014 and refix her seniority from the said date.

2. The petitioner was recruited as Constable in Haryana Police on 07.03.2007. She in 2014 participated in Lower School Course competition conducted by respondent under 55% quota. She scored 55 out of 60 marks in the written test. She stood first in the written test. As per procedure prescribed under Rule 13.7 of Punjab Police Rules, 1934 (as applicable to State of Haryana) (for short ‘PPR’), she participated in the second stage test i.e. parade test. As per Rule 13.7(3) of PPR, she was supposed to secure at least 50% marks in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top