SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1058

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKAS ALIAS VIKASH ALIAS NINNI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.91 dated 15.05.2024, registered at Police Station Jakhal, District Fatehabad, under Sections 21(B), 27-A of NDPS Act, 1985

2. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in custody for more than 8 months. He alleges false implication. His name surfaced based on the disclosure statement of co-accused, Ajay, from whom non-commercial quantity of contraband was allegedly effected, it being 6.50 grams of heroin, who has since been granted bail by the trial Court. There is no recovery effected from the petitioner and no evidence has also emerged to connect him to the case, but for the aforesaid disclosure statement, which is inadmissible in the eyes of law as per the judgment passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Tofan Singh vs. State of Tamil Nadu, 2021 (1) RCR (Crl.) 1. Charges have been framed on 24.10.2025, however, none out of 16 PWs has been examined. He is involved in 4 more cases on the basis of disclosure statements, in 3 of which he is on bail. Reliance is placed on the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Maulana Mohd. Amir Rashad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top