SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1060

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARDEEP ALIAS DEEPAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


(210)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-65478-2025 Date of Decision:03.02.2026 PARDEEP ALIAS DEEPAD ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Raman Chawla, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Vipul Sherwal, Asstt. A.G., Haryana.

****

JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J.

The prayer in the present petition under Section 482 of BNSS is for the grant of anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.162 dated 06.07.2025 registered under Sections 21-(B), 29/61/85 of NDPS Act at Police Station Uklana, District Hisar.

2. The brief facts of the case are that Manpreet wife of Amrik @ Amrika and Sunny were apprehended. 7.54 grams of heroin (Chitta) came to be recovered from Manpreet wife of Amrik @ Amrika. She disclosed that she had purchased the heroin from Sudesh @ Rani wife of Pardeep @ Deepad (petitioner). Sudesh @ Rani was arrested and disclosed that the heroin given to her by her husband had been sold by her to Manpreet.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that in the instant case, the petitioner has been named in the disclosure statement of his co-

accused. As he has been named in the disclosure statement a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top