SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1067

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RASHPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

208 CRM-M-879-2026 RASHPAL SINGH ....PETITIONER V/s STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ....RESPONDENT Date of decision: 03.02.2026 Date of uploading: 03.02.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: Mr. Jeetain, Advocate and Mr. Harkanwar Veer Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Jaypreet Singh, DAG, Punjab.

Ms. Nikita Garg, Advocate for the complainant.

*****

SUMEET GOEL , J .

1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.88 dated 07.08.2024, registered for offences punishable under Sections 420 & 406 of the IPC, 1860 and Section 13 of the Punjab Travel Professionals (Regulation) Act, 2014, at Police Station Moonak, District Sangrur.

2. On 13.01.2026, the following order was passed:-

“Apprehending his arrest in FIR No.88 dated 07.08.2024, registered for offences punishable under Sections 420 & 406 of the IPC, 1860 and Section 13 of the Punjab Travel Professionals (Regulation) Act, 2014, at Police Station Moonak, District Sangrur; the petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeki

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top