IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH

111 (4 cases) CRM-M-67178-2025 CRM-M-67974-2025 CRM-M-67996-2025 &

CRM-M-68060-2025 Date of Decision: 31.01.2026 YOGESH TYAGI ... Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL.

****

Present: Mr. Shiv Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioners.

Ms. Maninee, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Mr. Vijay Kumar, AAG, Haryana.

****

H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL)

All these four petitions are being decided by this common order since the controversy involved therein is the same. For the sake of brevity, the prayer clause is being referred to from CRM-M-67178-2025.

2. The said petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of order dated 27.10.2025 passed by the trial Court in a Complaint Case No.1050 of 2016 dated 30.01.2016 (Old Complaint No.235 of 2015) filed under Section 138 of the N.I.

Act, 1881.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner (accused in the trial Court) has examined ten material witnesses in his defence, and he wants to examine four more witnesses mentioned at Sr. No.09