SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1119

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJU & ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

201 CRR-1294-2010 (O&M)

Date of decision : 31.01.2026 Raju & Ors.

..... Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana ..... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Hitesh Verma, Amicus Curiae for the petitioners.

Mr. Parveen Kumar Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

*****

SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J. (oral

1. For the commission of offence punishable under Sections 323, 325 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the FIR No.30 dated 27.01.1998 was lodged in Police Station Punhana. Once the FIR was lodged, the investigation was taken up by the police, and as an outcome of abovesaid investigation, the petitioners were sent to face trial to the Court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate Punhana, hereinafter being referred to as ‘trial Court’ only.

2. The petitioners participated in the abovementioned trial, which by virtue of judgment dated 20.05.2008 culminated into their conviction.

Thus, by virtue of order on quantum of sentence, dated 22.05.2008, the petitioners were awarded following sentences:-

Accused Under Section Imprisonment Fine
Raju, Ilyas and Sattar 323 read with Section 34 IPC To undergo rigorous impr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top