SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1121

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BAJAN KAUR AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
TEJA SINGH AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on : 30.11.2025 Date of Pronouncement : 31.01.2026 Uploaded on : 04 .02.2026 Bajan Kaur and others ......Appellants Vs.

Teja Singh and others ......Respondents Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Maneet Kaushik, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate, for respondent No.3-Insurance Company.

****

S UDEEPTI SHARMA J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 18.10.2008 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sonipat (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation, granted to the appellants/claimants to the tune of Rs.2,69,200/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum, on account of death of Gurvinder Singh in a Motor Vehicular Accident, occurred on 18.06.2007.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, the detailed narration of the facts of the case is not reproduced a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top