SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1123

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARDIAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MAHINDER SINGH AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on:23.01.2026 Pronounced on: 31.01.2026 Uploaded on : 02.02.2026 Hardial Singh … Appellant Versus Mahinder Singh & Others … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Shubam Gupta, Advocate for the appellant.

None for respondent No.1.

Mr. I.S.Kingra, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

*****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL, 1. The present appeal has been preferred by the claimant/appellant under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the award dated 05.04.2001 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bathinda, whereby compensation of ₹1,00,000/- was awarded under Section163-A of the Act, for the injuries sustained by the appellant in a motor vehicular accident.

BACKGROUND FACTS

2. On 27.01.1999, he was travelling in Bus No. PB-12C-9312 from Malout towards Ferozepur. When the bus reached near Bathinda Bypass, within the jurisdiction of Police Station Muktsar, the driver of the bus drove the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner and struck a truck coming from the opposite direction. As a result of the accident, several passengers sustained injuries, including the claimant.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top