Kerala HC Issues Notice to Digi Yatra Foundation in PIL Seeking Strict Compliance with DPDP Act 2023 for Airport Passenger Data: High Court of Kerala
07 Mar 2026
Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
CJI Kant: Action Needed for More Women Judges
10 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJ KUMAR BISHNOI – Appellant
Versus
HARYANA STATE FEDERATION OF CONSUMERS COOPERATIVE WHOLESALE STORES LTD. AND ANR. – Respondent
204 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 30.01.2026 RAJ KUMAR BISHNOI ....Petitioner Versus HARYANA STATE FEDERATION OF CONSUMERS COOPERATIVE WHOLESALE STORES LTD. AND ANR.
....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Puneet Jindal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate for respondents.
****
HARPREET SINGH BRAR , J (Oral):
1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing order dated 07.04.2017 (Annexure P-8) passed by the Disciplinary Authority/Respondent No.2, whereby a sum of Rs.14,57,167/- has been wrongly and illegally ordered to be recovered from the petitioner allegedly on the alleged ground that the petitioner had
Retrospective retirement orders are unlawful as they infringe on employees' accrued rights and benefits.
A government employee cannot be denied pensionary benefits unless there are charges or charge memo or charge sheet filed against him under Rules 9(2)(a) and 9(6) of the Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article