SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1135

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MULTAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


206 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 30.01.2026 Multan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Manoj Kumar Taya, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Saurabh Girdhar, Asstt.A.G., Haryana.

Ms. Tanvir Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Devender Punia, Advocate for respondent No.3.

****

HARPREET SINGH BRAR , J (Oral):

1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.3, The Pundri Cooperative Marketing- cum-Processing Society Ltd., Pundri, to release payment of interest @ 12% per annum on the retiral benefits of the petitioner, which were withheld from the date of his retirement i.e. 31.07.2015 until the date of actual realisation i.e. 13.02.2018.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that after rendering uninterrupted service from 1975 until his superannuation on 31.07.2015, his legitimate retiral benefits were withheld without any justifiable cause for a period exceeding two and a half years. He further submitted that the belated release

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top