SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1147

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARJINDER SINGH VIRK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR – Respondent


101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided on: 30.01.2026 Harjinder Singh Virk ..... Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Nitin Mittoo, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Ms. Ramta Chowdhary, DAG, Punjab.

Mr.Anshul Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Rajesh Bhardwaj, J.

1. Prayer in the present second petition is for cancellation of bail granted to respondent No.2 vide order dated 14.10.2019, in a case FIR No.22, dated 06.03.2019, under Sections 420, 408, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar Phagwara, District Kapurthala.

2. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the author of the FIR, who lodged the FIR No.22, dated 06.03.2019. It is submitted that respondent No.2 had approached this Court praying for grant of anticipatory bail by way of filing CRM-M-30864-2019 and this Court vide impugned order dated 14.10.2019 pleased to grant him anticipatory bail. It is submitted that this Court while granting bail to respondent No.2 had taken into consideration the compromise arrived at between the parties before the Medi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top