2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1148
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ROSHANDEEP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent
##PAGE1##
210
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-54060-2025
Date of Decision: 30.01.2026
ROSHANDEEP SINGH
…Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA
Present : Mr. Laghuinder Sekhon, Advocate
and Ms. Sweedel Goyal, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Surinderjit Singh Nahar, A.A.G., Punjab.
SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL)
1. The prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 of the
Bharartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is for grant of regular bail to the
petitioner in case FIR No.45 dated 01.03.2025, registered under
Sections 21-C and 29 of the NDPS Act, at Police Station City Kotkapura,
District Faridkot.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present
petitioner has been nominated on disclosure statement of the co-accused,
which is inadmissible in evidence; except the disclosure statement, there is
no other evidence against the present petitioner; petitioner has been in
custody since 14.06.2025; challan has been filed and charges have been
framed on 10.09.2025, and hence no useful purpose will be served by further
keeping the petitioner in custody. In support of his contentions, learned
counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgments of Hon’ble the Apex
1 of 4
::: Downloaded on - 08-02-2026 20:55:59 :::
##PAGE2##CRM-M-54060-2025 2
Court in Shince Babu vs The State of Kerala and another (Special Leave to
Appeal (Crl.) No(s) 16642/2023) decided on 21.02.2024 as well as
Mahendra vs The State of Rajasthan Crl. No(s).2599/2024 decided on
10.07.2024.
3. Learned State counsel submits that the present case pertains to
recovery of a commercial quantity of contraband, i.e. 262 grams of Heroine,
hence attracting the rigours of Section 37 of NDPS Act; petitioner has been
nominated as an accused being the supplier of the recovered contraband; as
per the separate disclosure statements of both accused, the recovered heroine
was part of consignment of 300 grams of Heroine which was supplied by
present petitioner to the co-accused. In the disclosure statement of co-
accused Manjit Singh, a categorical attribution has been made against the
petitioner, that the co-accused along with his wife indulged in sale of Heroin
supplied by the present petitioner, and owed a sum of rupees nine lakh to the
petitioner; upon his release on bail on 13.02.2025, he (co-accused Manjit
Singh) again came in contact with present petitioner, who told him that the
co-accused Manjit Singh could return the sum due after selling Heroine
supplied by present petitioner; accordingly, present petitioner supplied a
consignment of 300 grams of Heroin, and out of the same consignment, 262
grams of Heroine was recovered in the present case. Learned State counsel
further apprised the Court that petitioner does not have clean and clear
antecedents, as he is involved in nine more cases, out of which three cases
are under NDPS Act; trial on-going and the charges have already been
framed in this case. Hence, prayed for dismissal of the petition seeking
regular bail to the petitioner.
4. Heard.
2 of 4
::: Downloaded on - 08-02-2026 20:56:00 :::
##PAGE3##CRM-M-54060-2025 3
5. Petitioner has sought to rely on ratio of law held in Shince
Babu vs The State of Kerala and another (Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.)
No(s) 16642/2023) decided on 21.02.2024 as well as Mahendra vs The
State of Rajasthan Crl. No(s).2599/2024 decided on 10.07.2024. However,
this Court finds that facts of both the above-stated cases are distinguishable
from the case of present petitioner, as one of the primary considerations for
the grant of bail was clean antecedents. Contrastingly, present petitioner
does not have clean antecedents, as he has multiple criminal cases lodged
against him, out of which, three are under N.D.P.S. Act. Hence, the present
petitioner’s case cannot derive any benefit from the above-cited judgements.
6. From the facts and circumstances of the case and the rival
contentions, it emerges that a commercial quantity of contraband, namely
262 grams of Heroine, has been recovered,