210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 30.01.2026 ROSHANDEEP SINGH …Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present : Mr. Laghuinder Sekhon, Advocate and Ms. Sweedel Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Surinderjit Singh Nahar, A.A.G., Punjab.

SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL)

1. The prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 of the Bharartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.45 dated 01.03.2025, registered under Sections 21-C and 29 of the NDPS Act, at Police Station City Kotkapura, District Faridkot.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present petitioner has been nominated on disclosure statement of the co-accused, which is inadmissible in evidence; except the disclosure statement, there is no other evidence against the present petitioner; petitioner has been in custody since 14.06.2025; challan has been filed and charges have been framed on 10.09.2025, and hence no useful purpose will be served by further keeping the petitioner in custody. In support of his contentions, learned counsel for the petitioner relied upon the