SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1167

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SWARAN SINGH AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
SARDUL SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (102 Date of Decision:-30.01.2026 Swaran Singh and Others … Appellants Versus Sardul Singh and Others ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Mr. Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anamika Sheoran, Advocate for the appellants.

Ms. Rupinder K. Thind, Advocate with Mr. Balsher Singh, Advocate for the respondents.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral)

1. The present Regular Second Appeal (hereinafter referred to as “RSA”) has been instituted by the appellants–plaintiffs to challenge the judgment and decree dated 01.02.1995 rendered by the learned Additional District Judge, Amritsar, whereby the findings of the Trial Court were affirmed in their entirety. The Trial Court, by its judgment and decree dated 16.03.1992, passed by the learned Sub-Judge, 1st Class, Tarn Taran, had decreed the suit instituted by the appellants–plaintiffs seeking a declaratory relief.

1.1. The appellants now impugn the concurrent findings of both courts below, contending that the same are legally untenable and factually erroneous, and seek appropriate redress through the appellate jurisdiction of this Court.

2. Briefly stated,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top