SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1186

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL RAJPURA – Appellant
Versus
APPELLATE AUTHORITY AND ORS – Respondent



105 (17 cases)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11730-2014 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 29.01.2026 MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

2. CWP-11731-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER /S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

3. CWP-11732-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

4. CWP-11733-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

5. CWP-11734-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

6. CWP-11735-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

7. CWP-11736-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

8. CWP-11737-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

9. CWP-11738-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

10. CWP-11739-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

11. CWP-11740-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

12. CWP-11741-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

13. CWP-11742-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

14. CWP-11743-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

15. CWP-11744-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

16. CWP-11745-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS

17. CWP-11746-2014 (O&M)

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAJPURA -PETITIONER V/S APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972-CUM-ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

-RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner(s)-MC.

Mr. Chetan Kapoor, Advocate, for respondent-workman in each petition.

*****

KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral)

1. All the aforesaid petitions are amenable to be decided together, as a common issue is involved therein, and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties concerned, these are taken together, for final adjudication. For the sake of brevity, the facts are being carved out from CWP-11730-2014.

2. Through the instant petition, as cast under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a challenge is thrown to the order dated 30.11.2011 (Annexure P-1), passed by the control

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top