IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARPREET KAUR AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
VARINDER SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent
##PAGE1##
FAO-3446-2021 (O&M) -1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
272-2 FAO-3446-2021 (O&M)
Date of decision: 29.01.2026
Harpreet Kaur and another ...Appellant(s)
Vs.
Varinder Singh and others ...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:- Mr. B.D.Sharma, Advocate
for the appellants.
Mr. Rishav Jain, Advocate for respondent No.1.
Mr. Aman Sharma, Advocate for the respondent
No.2 and 3-PRTC.
***
NIDHI GUPTA, J.
The present appeal has been filed by the claimants seeking
enhancement of compensation of Rs.12,39,600/- awarded by the learned
Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jalandhar (hereinafter referred to as “the
learned Tribunal”) vide Award dated 05.08.2019 passed in MACP Case No.
162 dated 16.07.2018 filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act,
(hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). The 2 claimants before the learned
Tribunal are 47-year-old mother; and 54-year-old father of the deceased
Harminder Singh, who was 23 years old at the time of accident.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the learned Tribunal on the
basis of pleadings and evidence adduced before it concluded that the
deceased-Harminder Singh had died due to the injuries suffered by him in
DIVYANSHI
2026.01.30 19:00
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE2##FAO-3446-2021 (O&M) -2 -
a motor vehicular accident that took place on 30.05.2018 due to the rash
and negligent driving of a Bus bearing registration No.PB-10DR-1115
(hereinafter “the offending vehicle”) being driven by respondent No.1;
and owned by respondents No.2 and 3. The Tribunal awarded the above
compensation along with interest @ 8% per annum. Respondents No. 1 to
3 were held liable to pay the said compensation jointly and severally.
3. Learned counsel for the appellants seeks enhancement of
compensation by submitÝng that income of the deceased has been taken
on the lower side as only Rs.8,000/-p.m. as that of an unskilled worker. It
is submitted that it was the clear case of the appellants before the learned
Tribunal that deceased was a student of B.A.Hons; and was also an
agriculturist alongwith his father. It is contended that therefore, income of
the deceased ought to have been taken as that of a skilled worker. It is
further submitted that future prospects, multiplier and deduction have
been incorrectly made and, nothing has been awarded by way of
consortium to the appellants. It is accordingly prayed that the present
appeal be allowed; and the compensation be enhanced as above.
4. Per contra, ld. counsel for respondents No.1, 2 and 3 oppose
submissions of the appellants and submit that the impugned Award
suffers from no infirmity as the compensation awarded to the appellants is
just and fair. Hence, the present appeal deserves to be dismissed.
5. No other argument is raised on behalf of the parties. I have
heard ld. counsel and perused the case file in detail. I find some merit in
the submissions advanced on behalf of the appellants.
DIVYANSHI
2026.01.30 19:00
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##FAO-3446-2021 (O&M) -3 -
6. It has been contended by the appellants that deceased was a
student of B.A. Hons from DAV University, Jalandhar and was helping his
father in agriculture and therefore, his income ought to have been taken
as that of a skilled worker. However, perusal of the record of the case
shows that no document whatsoever has been produced by the
appellants to prove their above said contentions. Although it has been
emphatically stated by learned counsel for the appellants that the
deceased was a student of B.A. Hons. However, on Court queries, learned
counsel for the appellants is unable to deny that no Roll No., Admission
No., Certification or some other documentary evidence was produced by
the appellants to prove this fact. It is further pleaded that deceased was
doing agricultural work and was earning Rs.10,000/- p.m. Again, the
appellants have led no documentary evidence to show that deceased was
earning Rs.10,000/- p.m. Be that as it may, even if it is ass
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.