SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1228

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SANJEET KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 05.02.2026 Sanjeet Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Sushil Jain, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ravi Partap Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana (assisted by Mr. Rupender, Law Officer, Haryana Staff Selection Commission)

***

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 09.10.2019 whereby respondent has refused to allot him regimental number. He is further seeking direction to respondents to issue him joining/appointment letter.

2. The petitioner, pursuant to Advertisement No.3/2018, applied for the post of Constable under BCA Category. He successfully cleared Written Test followed by Physical Measurement and Physical Screening Test. The respondent, during verification of his credentials, found that an FIR No.284 dated 18.09.2017 under Sections 346, 323, 328, 342, 363, 366 376 and 112 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and Section 3 of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top