IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ARMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRM-M-65900-2025 (O&M) -1-
208-2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
-.-
CRM-M-65900-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 05.02.2026
Arman ....Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Haryana ....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Present: Ms. Manita Dalla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG Haryana.
-.-
MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral)
1. The present is the first petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying for grant of regular bail to the petitioner
in FIR No. 251 dated 15.08.2024, registered under Sections 109(1), 190, 191(2)
and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 25 of the Arms Act,
at Police Station Dadri Sadar, District Charkhi Dadri.
2. The brief facts of the case are that on 15.08.2024, on the statement of
complainant Umesh @ Pistol, FIR No. 251 was registered at Police Station Dadri
Sadar, District Charkhi Dadri. The complainant stated that in the evening, while he
was present at his fields near the tea shop situated close to the CNG Petrol Pump
on Dadri–Jhajjar Road along with his uncle Dalbir, Ashok and his brother Vinay
were also present at the shop. At about 6:20 PM, three motorcycles arrived at the
spot, two persons each were riding two motorcycles and three persons were riding
the third motorcycle. Two persons got down from the motorcycles and started
abusing the complainant and threatened him. The complainant identified them as
Ashish @ Kaku son of Devendra and Sumit @ Kala son of Om Parkash @ Bhallu
TRIPTI SAINI
2026.02.06 09:28
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE2##CRM-M-65900-2025 (O&M) -2-
Nai. It is alleged that thereafter Sumit @ Kala fired at the complainant with a pistol
with the intention to kill him, however, the complainant managed to escape the
gunshot and ran towards the fields to save his life. All the accused chased the
complainant with the intention to kill him, upon which the persons present at the
shop raised an alarm. Ashish @ Kaku and Sumit @ Kala are alleged to have fired
at the complainant along with three to four other associates, though the gunshot did
not hit the complainant. After some time, when the complainant returned to the
spot, he found an empty cartridge lying there. The complainant further stated that
Ashish @ Kaku and Sumit @ Kala had a previous grudge against him. On the
basis of the written complaint submitted by the complainant, the present FIR was
registered against Ashish @ Kaku, Sumit @ Kala and their associates for offences
under Sections 109, 190, 191(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and
Sections 25/54/59 of the Arms Act, attributing the role of firing with a pistol to
accused Sumit @ Kala, presence and participation in the occurrence to accused
Ashish @ Kaku, and involvement of other unidentified associates in chasing and
threatening the complainant with the intention to kill him.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has
been falsely implicated in the present case and his name does not find mention in
the original FIR. It is submitted that in the FIR, only two persons namely Ashish @
Kaku and Sumit @ Kala were specifically named and the allegation of firing a
gunshot is attributed solely to co-accused Sumit @ Kala. The complainant did not
sustain any injury and admittedly, it is a no-injury case.
4. It is further argued that the name of the petitioner surfaced for the first
time only in the supplementary statement of the complainant recorded on
12.09.2024, i.e. after more than one month from the date of registration of the FIR,
which clearly reflects an afterthought and an improved version of the prosecution
TRIPTI SAINI
2026.02.06 09:28
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
##PAGE3##CRM-M-65900-2025 (O&M) -3-
case. Even in the said supplementary statement, no specific role or overt act has
been attributed to the petitioner.
5. Learned counsel submits that as per the prosecution version itself, the
only allegation against the petitioner is that he was seen rid
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.