SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1292

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NANHI DEVI AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
KRISHAN KUMAR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6244 of 2022 (O&M)

Date of decision: February 5th, 2026 Nanhi Devi and others .....Petitioners Versus Krishan .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Ms. Renu Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners (through V.C.).

Mr. Nissim Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. S.K. Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent.

VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. This is a civil revision petition under Section 115 CPC read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 30.11.2022 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kaithal.

2. On 04.02.2026, this Court was pleased to pass the following order:

“Present:- None for the petitioners.

Mr. Nissim Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent.

On 04.01.2023, a Coordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order.-

"Present: Ms. Renu Dhull, Advocate for the petitioners.

***

Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the Coordinate Bench of this Court while passing order in CR-4067-2016 titled as Anil Kumar and others vs. Maninderbir Singh has already referred the matter to a larger Bench involving a question of law whether challenge to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top