SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1297

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH CHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH State of Haryana and others ......Appellants Vs.

Ramesh Chand .....Respondent Reserved on : 10.12.2025 Date of Decision: 05.02.2026 Uploaded On: 06.02.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana.

Mr. Ramesh Chand, respondent (in-person).

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (Oral)

1. The present appeal is preferred against judgment and decree dated 10.05.2024 and 05.03.2025 passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Nuh and learned Additional District Judge, Nuh, whereby, the civil suit filed by the respondent was decreed in his favour and appeal filed by the appellant against judgment and decree dated 10.05.2024 was dismissed respectively.

2. Brief facts of the case as per pleadings in the civil suit are that respondent having Matric qualification was recruited on the post of JBT Teacher on 18.10.1968. He was granted functional pay scale (Rs.1200-2040) of JBT Teacher on 01.09.1986. Later on, he improved his educational qualification as B.A. and B.Ed. and was promoted as SS Master on 14.01.1992/20.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top