IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision: 05.02.2026 Raj Kumari and others ...Appellant(s)

Vs.

Ram Pal and another ...Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present:- Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate for the appellants.

******

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

Defendants are in Second Appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the learned Courts below; whereby the suit filed by the plaintiffs/respondents for permanent and mandatory injunction, has been partly decreed.

2. It was the pleaded case of the plaintiffs in the plaint that they are owners in possession of land measuring 1K 14M. It was alleged that defendants had illegally encroached upon part of the suit land measuring 2¾ M by merging it into their boundary wall. It was further alleged that defendants are threatening plaintiffs to encroach upon the remaining land of the plaintiffs. Accordingly, suit for possession and mandatory and permanent injunction was filed on 05.10.2009.

3. Upon appraisal of the pleadings and the evidence led by the parties, the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Subdivision, Bilaspur had partly decreed the suit of the plaintiffs vide judgment and decree dated

13.10.2016, as