IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA No.1516 of 2022 Shaina Jain . . . . Appellant vs.

Naib Singh (now deceased) through LRs and others . . . . Respondents Reserved on: February 03, 2026 Pronounced on: February 04, 2026 Pronounced fully/operative part : Fully CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Sumeet Mahajan, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Shrey Sachdeva, Advocate and Ms. Radhika, Advocate for appellants DEEPAK GUPTA, J.

The present Regular Second Appeal has been preferred by defendant No.2–Shaina Jain, who was the counter-claimant before the learned Trial Court, assailing the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the courts below, whereby her counter-claim seeking declaration that the sale deed dated 07.04.2004, purportedly executed by her through her alleged attorney Surjan Singh, is null and void, has been dismissed.

2. The factual matrix, in brief, is that the plaintiffs instituted a suit for specific performance in April 2004 on the basis of an agreement to sell dated 22.10.1998 in respect of land measuring 20 Kanal 19 Marla. It was pleaded that the defendants, including the present appellant, had executed powers of attorney in favour of Surjan