SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1342

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
STATE OF PUNJAB – Appellant
Versus
MADAN MOHAN – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on :-30.01.2026 Date of Pronouncement:-04.02.2026 Uploaded on:-05.02.2026 State of Punjab through Collector District Faridkot … Appellant Versus Madan Mohan ... Respondent ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by :-

Mr. I.S. Kingra, Senior DAG, Punjab.

None for the respondent.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J .

1. The appellant/defendant-State, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 09.09.1997 of the learned District Judge, Faridkot, which reversed the well-reasoned judgment and decree dated 25.01.1995 of the learned Sub-Judge, 2nd Class, Faridkot, respectfully invokes the appellate jurisdiction of this Court through the present Regular Second Appeal (hereinafter referred to as “RSA”). The appellant seeks restoration of the decree rightly granted by the learned Trial Court and appropriate redress for the substantial miscarriage of justice occasioned by the impugned decree. It is respectfully submitted that the impugned judgment and decree are vitiated by manifest perversity, grave errors of law, and is a fundamentally flawed appreciation of the evidentiary record, resulting in serious injustice..

2. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top