IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUNITA DEVI AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
BAHADUR SINGH AND ANR – Respondent
##PAGE1##
254
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
FAO-2136-2021 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 04.02.2026
Sunita Devi and Others
... Appellants
Versus
Bahadur Singh and Another
... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present : Mr. Ankit Saini, Advocate for
Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. Sanjeev Kodan, Advocate for respondent No.2.
ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)
1. Present appeal has been preferred by the claimant-appellants
aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, Kurukshetra (hereinafter referred to as ‘Tribunal’) vide the
impugned award dated 04.03.2020 on account of death of Chiman Ram @
Chiman Lal in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 15.09.2018.
2. Since the factum of the accident is not in dispute, the facts are
not being adverted to for the sake of brevity.
3. The Tribunal in the present case had awarded the following
compensation :
Sr.No. Heads Compensation Awarded
1 Monthly Income ₹8,500/-
2 Annual Income ₹1,02,000/- [₹8,500 x 12]
3 Deduction - 1/4th ₹76,500/- [₹1,02,000 - ₹25,500]
4 Future Prospects - 25% ₹95,625/- [₹76,500 + ₹19,125]
5 Multiplier - 15 ₹14,34,375/- [₹95,625 x 15]
JITENDER KUMAR
2026.02.05 09:56
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
Chandigarh
##PAGE2##FAO-2136-2021 -2-
6 Loss of estate ₹15,000/-
7 Funeral expenses ₹15,000/-
8 Loss of consortium ₹40,000/-
Total Compensation ₹15,04,375/
Interest 7.5% per annum
4. Learned counsel for the claimant-appellants would contend that
that he does not challenge the income, deduction and the multiplier as applied
by the Tribunal. He, however, states that the Tribunal has made an addition of
25% towards loss of future prospects which ought to have been 40% keeping
in view the age of the deceased, who was 40 years of age at the time of the
accident. It is further the contention that the compensation awarded under the
conventional heads as well as under the head ‘loss of consortium’ is not in
accordance with the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in cases of
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. [(2017) 16
SCC 680], Magma General Insurance Company Limited vs. Nanu Ram
alias Chuhru Ram & Ors. [(2018) 18 SCC 130] and N. Jayasree & Ors.
vs. Cholamandalam M.S General Insurance Company Ltd. [2021(4)
RCR (Civil) 642]
5. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent No.2-Insurance
Company has vehemently argued that sufficient amount has already been
awarded as compensation in the present case and that there is no scope of any
enhancement.
6. Heard.
7. Admittedly, no appeal has been preferred by the Insurance
Company. In the present case, since no challenge has been laid by the learned
counsel for the claimant-appellants to the income, deduction and the
multiplier as applied by the Tribunal, the same are maintained accordingly.
JITENDER KUMAR
2026.02.05 09:56
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
Chandigarh
##PAGE3##FAO-2136-2021 -3-
The argument of learned counsel for the claimant-appellants that the Tribunal
has wrongly made an addition of 25% towards loss of future prospects,
deserves to be accepted. The deceased in the present case was 40 years of age
and as per law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Pranay Sethi
(supra), an addition of 40% would be applicable towards loss of future
prospects.
8. Further, the compensation awarded under the conventional heads
and under the head ‘loss of consortium’ is not as per the law laid down by the
Hon’ble Supreme Court in the cases of Pranay Sethi (supra), Magma
General Insurance Company Limited (supra) and N. Jayasree (supra)
hence, the claimant-appellants would be entitled to ₹18,000/- (₹15,000+20%
increase) towards loss of estate and ₹18,000/- (₹15,000+20% increase)
towards funeral expenses as also to ₹48,000/- each (₹40,000+20% increase)
towards loss of consortium. Accordingly, the reworked compensation is as
under :
Sr.No. Heads Compensation Awarded
1 Monthly Income ₹8,500/-
2 Annual Income ₹1,02,000/- [₹8,500 x 12]
3 Deduction - 1/4th ₹76,500/- [₹
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.