SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1388

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUKHCHAIN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

208 CRM-M-4501-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 06.02.2026 Sukhchain Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY *****

Present : Mr. J.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner (cid:2)(cid:3)(cid:4)(cid:1)(cid:2)(cid:5)(cid:6)(cid:7)(cid:8)(cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:1)(cid:10)(cid:7)(cid:6)(cid:11)(cid:12)(cid:1)(cid:13)(cid:14)(cid:15)(cid:5)(cid:9)(cid:16)(cid:1)(cid:17)(cid:13)(cid:18)(cid:1)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:6)(cid:21)(cid:5)(cid:22)

*****

AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 483 BNSS is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.13 dated 20.01.2021, registered under Sections 21(c) of NDPS Act, 25 of Arms Act (22(c) of NDPS Act added later on) at Police Station STF Phase-IV, Mohali (for whole Punjab), District Jalandhar, Punjab.

2. Learned counsel contends that the petitioner has been in custody for more than 5 years. There was no link to connect him with the alleged recovery. The sample was not sent to FSL within 72 hours. No independent witness was joined at the time of recovery. The mandatory provisions of Sections 42, 50 and 52

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top