227 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 06.02.2026 Jagdish Chander (deceased) through his LR ... Petitioner Versus Surinder Pal ... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN Present : Mr. B.D. Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Puneet Jindal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rahul Bansal, Advocate for the respondent.

ALKA SARIN, J. (Oral)

1. Prayer in the present revision petition is limited to the extent that three applications being an application for amendment of the plaint; secondly for leading additional evidence; and thirdly for framing of the additional issues, may be decided before hearing the appeal.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that three separate applications were filed; one for framing of additional issues (Annexure P-5); secondly, for leading additional evidence (Annexure P-4); and thirdly for amendment of the plaint (Annexure P-3). It is further the contention that the Trial Court vide the impugned order dated 04.09.2024 had directed that all the applications be disposed off alongwith the main appeal or before the arguments on the main appeal. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further contend that a