IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH MANJU DEVI AND ORS.

......Appellants Vs.

ANGREJ SINGH AND ORS.

......Respondents Reserved on: 04.02.2026 Pronounced on: 06.02.2026 Uploaded on : 06.02.2026 Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced? NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Ms. Amarjeet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. M.S. Randhawa, Advocate for the appellants.

None for respondents No.1 (died).

None for respondent No.2 (despite service).

Mr. Ravinder Arora, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance Company.

****

SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.

1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 17.04.2009 passed in the claim petition filed under Section 166 and 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short ‘1988 Act’), by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Narnaul (for short, 'the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation granted to the claimants to the tune of Rs.8,00,000/- along with interest @ 8% per annum, on account of death of Rambilas in a Motor Vehicular Accident, occurred on 22.12.2006.

2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by t