SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1428

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARNEK SINGH AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
MS ANINDITA MITRA AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on: 19.01.2026 Pronounced on: 06.02.2026 Harnek Singh and another … Petitioners Versus Ms. Anindita Mitra, Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Punjab and another … Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Anil Mehta, Advocate, and Ms. Sukriti Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. Jastej Singh, Addl. AG, Punjab.

***

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.

The instant contempt petition has been preferred under Article

215 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (for short, ‘the 1971 Act’), seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for deliberate and willful disobedience of the order dated 21.07.2011 (Annexure P-2), passed in CWP-4267-2010, titled as “Harnek Singh and others v. State of Punjab and others” and the order dated 23.03.2012 (Annexure P-3), passed in COCP-941-2011, titled as “Disabled Persons Association v. SC Aggarwal and another” and COCP-3142-2011, titled as “Harnesh Singh and another v. Hussan Lal”

2. The petitioners are visually disabled persons, who along with other persons, had instituted CWP-4267-2010 on the basis of a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top