SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1437

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
BAKHSHISH SINGH AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.4911 of 2017 Date of decision: February 5th, 2026 Rajesh Kumar @ Bittu ...Petitioner Versus Bakshish Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Karan Bhardwaj, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Vishal Aggarwal and Mr. G.S. Sarao, Advocates for respondents No.1 to 7. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)

1. This is a civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 16.08.2016 (Annexure P-3), order dated 09.02.2017 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana as well as the order dated 19.04.2017 (Annexure P-10) passed by the trial Court vide which the objections filed by the petitioner dated 01.03.2017 (Annexure P-7) as well as the application filed by the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC read with Section 151 CPC dated 15.03.2017 (Annexure P-8) has been dismissed by the trial Court.

ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER:

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had filed objections dated 01.03.2017 in the application for passing final decree, on the ground that police officials al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top