IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of order :-04.02.2026 Davinder Kumar … Petitioner Versus Ramesh Lal ... Respondent ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present :- Mr. Mohit Jaggi, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J .( ORAL )

1. The petitioner has invoked the revisional jurisdiction of this Court to challenge the judgment and decree dated 03.05.2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Jalandhar, whereby the summary suit instituted by the petitioner under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of possession of the suit property, came to be dismissed.

2. It is contended that the petitioner, being the owner in settled and peaceful possession of the suit property, had purchased the same from Vijay Kumar pursuant to an agreement to sell dated 06.08.2010, under which possession was duly delivered. It is further averred that the respondent–defendant, on 28.07.2021, forcibly and unlawfully dispossessed the petitioner by breaking open the locks affixed to the suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of possession of the suit property.

3. The suit was contested by the respondent,