IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (202)

Date of Decision:-04.02.2026 Market Committee Budhlada and Another … Appellants Versus M/s Shri Roshan Oil and Cotton Mills, Budhlada ... Respondent ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present :-

Mr. Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate with Ms. Anamika Sheoran, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Sandeep Khunger, Advocate with Ms. Srisuti, Advocate and Mr. Sudrishti, Advocate for respondent.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J .( ORAL )

1. The appellants/defendants, being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 09.02.1996 rendered by the learned Additional District Judge, Mansa, whereby the well-reasoned findings and decree of the learned Additional Senior Sub-Judge, Mansa, dated 20.10.1995 was reversed, respectfully invoke the appellate jurisdiction of this Court by way of the present Regular Second Appeal. The Appellants seek the restoration of the decree passed by the learned Trial Court, as the impugned judgment is ex-facie unsustainable and vitiated by manifest perversity, serious legal infirmities, and a fundamentally flawed appreciation of the evidentiary record. It is respectfully submitted that the erroneous reversal of t