IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SMT. MANJEET – Appellant
Versus
LAL SINGH – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CRR-1706-2024 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRR-1706-2024 (O&M)
Smt. Manjeet …....Petitioner(s).
Versus
Lal Singh …....Respondent(s).
Judgment Judgment Operative Part Uploaded on
reserved on pronounced on Pronounced or full
19.01.2026 03.02.2026 Fully pronounced 03.02.2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA,
Present: Ms. Archana Chauhan, Advocate for
Ms. Vasundhra Asija, Advocate
for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Mohan Singh Rana, Advocate
for the respondent.
***
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
Criminal CIS No. NIA-116 of 2017 under Section 138 of the Negotiable
Complaint Instruments Act read with Section 420 IPC.
Date of decision: 24.01.2024.
Criminal CIS/CRA-101 of 2024 (CRA-25 of 2024)
Appeal
Date of decision: 16.08.2024.
Convict’s Penal provision Sentence
name
Smt. S. 138 of the Negotiable Simple imprisonment for one year and to pay
Manjeet Instruments Act, 1881 compensation of Rs.40,00,000/- to the
complainant.
1. This revision petition has arisen out of judgment dated 16.08.2024
passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram, vide which the judgment of
conviction dated 24.01.2024 and order of sentence dated 03.02.2024 passed by learned
Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Sohana in CIS No.NIA-116 of 2017 have been upheld,
1
1 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 10-02-2026 02:50:53 :::
##PAGE2##CRR-1706-2024 (O&M)
whereby the petitioner-accused was held guilty for offence under Section 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act and was convicted and sentenced, as stated above.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that an amicable settlement has
arrived at between the parties and the respondent-complainant has received the amount
of settlement from the petitioner and therefore, prayed for compounding of offence
under Section 138 of N.I. Act and acceptance of the revision petition.
3. Learned counsel representing the complainant/respondent has admitted
the factum of compromise between the parties and handed over affidavit dated
02.12.2025 of complainant Lal Singh, which is taken on record. He further submits
that he has specific instructions from the complainant/respondent that they have no
objection in case the revision petition is allowed and the petitioner is acquitted and the
judgment of conviction and order of sentence are set aside.
4. I have heard counsel for the parties and have perused the relevant
material placed on record.
5. As submitted by counsel for the petitioner, during the course of
proceedings, a settlement was effected between the parties and full and final settlement
has taken place. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that disputed
cheque(s) amount has already been paid by the petitioner to respondent and now,
nothing is due towards him, which is conceded by learned counsel for the respondent.
6. The object and purpose of proceeding initiated under the Negotiable
Instruments Act is to provide a compensatory mechanism for expeditious recovery of
money and not just punishing the offender, which is a secondary concern.
7. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Meters and Instruments Private
Limited and another Vs. Kanchan Mehta (2018) 1 SCC 560, has held as under:-
“7. This Court has noted that the object of the statute was to facilitate
smooth functioning of business transactions. The provision is necessary
as in many transactions’ cheques were issued merely as a device
to defraud the creditors. Dishonour of cheque causes incalculable
loss, injury and inconvenience to the Vide the Banking, Public
Financial Institutions and Negotiable Instruments Laws
2
2 of 3
::: Downloaded on - 10-02-2026 02:50:53 :::
##PAGE3##CRR-1706-2024 (O&M)
(Amendment) Act, 1988 payee and credibility of business transactions
suffers a setback. At the same time, it was also noted that nature of
offence under Section 138 primarily related to a civil wrong and the
2002 amendment specifically made it compoundable…...
xxxx xxxx xxxx
18.2. The object of the provision being primarily compensatory,
punitive element being mainly with the object of enforcing the
compensatory element, compounding at
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.