IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SIMMI RANI – Appellant
Versus
SATNAM VERMA – Respondent
##PAGE1##
1
TA-1259-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.208
TA-1259-2025
Date of Decision: 03.02.2026
SIMMI RANI
....Applicant
Versus
SATNAM VERMA
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ARCHANA PURI
Present:- Mr. J.S. Bhinder, Advocate
for the applicant.
Respondent proceeded against ex parte
vide order dated 14.01.2026.
*****
ARCHANA PURI, J. (Oral)
The applicant-wife has filed the present application for seeking
transfer of the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e.
DMC/723/2025, titled ‘Satnam Verma Vs. Simmi Rani’, filed by the
respondent-husband, pending in the Family Court, Patiala and she seeks
transfer of the same to the Court of competent jurisdiction at Sunam, District
Sangrur.
Upon notice issued, the respondent did not make appearance,
despite service and as such, was proceeded against ex parte.
SONU
2026.02.05 09:54
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
##PAGE2##2
TA-1259-2025
Counsel for the applicant heard.
It is submitted by the counsel for the applicant that the marriage
between the parties to the lis, had taken place on 04.02.2024, but no child
was born from the said wedlock. Unfortunately, matrimonial dispute arose
between the parties, as a result whereof, they are residing separate. The
applicant is not having any source of earning and as such, she is dependent
upon her parental family. The applicant has filed the petition under Sections
12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22 and 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic
Violence Act, as well as petition under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik
Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which are pending in the Courts at Sunam and the
respondent is making appearance in the said cases. The distance between
the two places is stated to be about 68 kms.
In view of the submissions aforesaid, more particularly,
considering the two other litigations, arising from the estranged marriage, to
be already pending in the Courts at Sunam, which are being pursued by the
respondent and above it, considering the fact about the respondent, having
not come forward to resist the application, the transfer application is allowed
and the petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act i.e.
DMC/723/2025, titled ‘Satnam Verma Vs. Simmi Rani’, filed by the
respondent-husband, stands transferred from the Family Court, Patiala, to
the Court of competent jurisdiction at Sunam, District Sangrur. The
requisite record of the aforesaid case be sent by the Family Court, Patiala, to
the District and Sessions Judge, Sangrur.
SONU
2026.02.05 09:54
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
##PAGE3##3
TA-1259-2025
Learned District and Sessions Judge, Sangrur, shall assign the
said petition to the Family Court (Camp Court) Sunam. Even, the parties are
directed to appear before the Family Court (Camp Court) Sunam, within a
period of one month from today onwards.
(ARCHANA PURI)
03.02.2026 JUDGE
Himanshu Vats
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes
Whether reportable : Yes/No
SONU
2026.02.05 09:54
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.