SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1590

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KIRPAL KAUR – Appellant
Versus
TARA SINGH ETC – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Reserved on :- 04.02.2026 Date of Pronouncement:-09.02.2026 Uploaded on:- 9.2.2026 Kirpal Kaur @ Palo … Appellant Versus Tara Singh and Others ... Respondents ****

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Argued by :-

Mr. Avnish Mittal, Advocate with Mr. Aparna Singhal, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. L.S. Sidhu, Advocate for respondent No.1.

****

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J .

1. The present Regular Second Appeal (hereinafter referred to as “RSA”) has been preferred by the appellant–defendant assailing the judgment and decree dated 14.08.1996 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Amritsar, whereby the findings recorded by the learned Trial Court were affirmed in their entirety. The learned Trial Court, vide judgment and decree dated 31.07.1989 rendered by the learned Sub Judge, Patti, had decreed the suit instituted by the respondents–plaintiffs seeking possession of the suit property. Aggrieved by the concurrent judgments and decrees of both the Courts below, the appellant has approached this Court contending that the impugned findings are legally unsustainable and vitiated by errors apparent on the face of the record.

2. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top