SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1591

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KRISHNA – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision :10.02.2026 KRISHNA AND OTHERS ... APPELLANTS VERSUS RAJESH AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. U.K. Agnihotri, Advocate with Mr. Anuj Y. Attri, Advocate for the appellants.

Mr. Shailender Singh, Advocate for respondent No. 1.

Mr. Aseem Aggarwal, Advocate (through V.C.)

for respondent No. 3.

****

PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)

1. Present appeal has been preferred by the wife, children and parents of the deceased, Sombir (hereinafter referred to as the “Deceased”), who died in motor vehicular accident which took place on 22.08.2000, on account of rash and negligent driving by Respondent No. 2 while driving dumper bearing registration No. HR-38- B/6517.

2. Being aggrieved by the impugned award dated 03.12.2002 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gurgaon (hereinafter referred to as “Tribunal”), vide which the appellants-claimants were found entitled to total compensation of Rs.6,27,000/-, the appellants-claimants are seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Tribunal as the same is not according to their entitlement.

3. Since in present appeal the only issue raised by ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top