SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1617

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
BALBIR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. – Respondent


207 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

Date of Decision: 09.02.2026 Balbir Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Gurinder Singh Dhillon, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG, Haryana.

****

JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 15.06.2016 whereby respondent rejected his claim of reimbursement of medical expenses.

2. The petitioner belonged to Haryana Police Force. On 26.06.2015, he went to Delhi to serve summons. He fell down from a bus in Delhi and got unconscious. He was taken away to Sant Parmanand Hospital by passerby. The Doctors after examining the petitioner found that he has suffered Mal-united Fracture Proximal Tibia (Fracture of knee). He was subjected to surgery on emergency basis. On 29.06.2015, his family members informed Police Station, Karnal about unconsciousness of the petitioner. He incurred a sum of Rs.1,05,574/- on aforesaid surgery. He requested respondent to reimburse his medical expenses, however, respondent rejecte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top