SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ASHOK KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
MEENA AND OTHERS – Respondent


S. No.124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****

CR No.1268 of 2026 Date of Decision:09.02.2026 Ashok Kumar .....Petitioner Vs.

Smt. Meena and others .....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHVIR SINGH RATHOR Present:- Mr. Nikhil Mittal, Advocate and Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

****

Yashvir Singh Rathor, J. (Oral)

1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 27.05.2025 (Annexure P.4) passed by Civil Judge, Yamuna Nagar vide which plaintiff- petitioner has been directed to deposit ad-valorem court fee on an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC moved by respondents – defendants No.1 to 3.

2. In view of the nature of the order proposed to be pased, issuance of notice to the respondents is dispensed with, as it would only delay the proceedings and cause unnecessary expenditure to the respondent.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and have perused the material placed on record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the plaintiff- petitioner has filed a suit for declaration and has challenged the sale deeds dated 04.06.2016 and 13.6.2016 on the basis of fraud and cheating played upon him by defendant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top