1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of decision:09.02.2026 Gurdeep Singh …Petitioner Versus Gurmukh Singh ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: Mr. Sandeep Chopra, Advocate for petitioner.

***

PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL)

Petitioner-defendant is aggrieved by impugned order dated

08.10.2025 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Patiala vide which his application for staying the execution proceedings was dismissed.

2. Admittedly, suit of respondent-plaintiff was decreed vide judgment and decree dated 06.09.2023 (Annexure P-2) passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) Patiala holding respondent-plaintiff entitled to relief of recovery of Rs.5,00,000/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing of suit till realization. Subsequent thereto, execution petition was filed and notices were received by petitioner-defendant. After coming to know about the execution petition, petitioner-defendant moved an application under Order IX Rule 13 of CPC (Annexure P-3) before the Executing Court for setting aside ex parte proceedings/order as well as ex parte judgment and decree dated 06.09.2023, which is stated to b