SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1660

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SURENDER AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.-

XOBJC-48-2023 Reserved on : 19.12.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 09.02.2026 Uploaded on : 09.02.2026 Cholamandlam MS General Insurance Company Ltd. ....Appellant Vs.

Surender and others ....Respondents Whether only the operative part of the judgment is pronounced?NO Whether full judgment is pronounced? YES CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Punit Jain, Advocate for the appellant-Insurance Company.

Mr. Subhash Chander, Advocate, for Mr. Sumit Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2 (in FAO-8506-2017)

for the cross-objector/respondent No.1 (in XOBJC-48-2023).

Ms. Inderpal Kaur, Advocate, for Mr. Ajay Ghangas, Advocate, for respondent No.3.

-.-

SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J.

FAO-8506-2017 (O&M)

1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant- Insurance Company for setting aside the award dated 28.02.2017 passed by the learned Tribunal under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, whereby, the claimants/respondents No.1 and 2 were awarded a compensation of Rs.10,22,000/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum on account of death of Rohan Kumar and the appellant-Insurance Company was held liable to pay the compe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top