IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-1215-2026 Date of decision: 06.02.2026 Mahabir and others ...Pe(cid:28)(cid:28)oners Versus Sunil Kumar and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Suryakant Gautam, Advocate for the pe(cid:28)(cid:28)oners.

****

DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)

The pe(cid:28)(cid:28)oners are some of the defendants in Civil Suit No.106 of 2023 (cid:28)tled Sunil Kumar Vs. Mahabir and others, pending before the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rohtak. They have approached this Court aggrieved by the order dated 03.11.2025, whereby their applica(cid:28)on filed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejec(cid:28)on of the plaint has been dismissed.

2. A perusal of the plaint shows that the plain(cid:28)ff ins(cid:28)tuted the suit seeking a decree of permanent and mandatory injunc(cid:28)on by asser(cid:28)ng that he is a resident of the locality and that defendants No.1 to 8, who are his neighbours, have encroached upon a public street, thereby obstruc(cid:28)ng its use. It is further pleaded that repeated representa(cid:28)ons were made to the Municipal Corpora(cid:28)on, Rohtak, but since no ac(cid:28)on was taken,