SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1697

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAMJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision : 05.02.2026 Vikramjit Singh …..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present : Mr. N.S. Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Satnampreet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab.

NAMIT KUMAR, J.

1. Instant writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of certiorari for setting aside the order dated 20.11.2025 (Annexure P-1), passed by respondent No.2, whereby claim of the petitioner for appointment as Up-Vaid has been rejected. Further prayer has been made for directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner and appoint him as Up-Vaid.

2. Brief facts of the case, as pleaded in the petition, are that the petitioner belongs to Scheduled Caste category. After 10+2, he obtained Diploma in Upvaid (Ayurvedic) from Punjab State Faculty of Ayurvedic and Unani Systems of Medicine, Patiala, in the year 2008, securing 59% marks. Thereafter, he completed his internship training at G.A.D. Boparai Kalan, District Ludhiana, from 20.01.2009 to 02.05.2009. The Registrar, Board of Ayurvedic and Unani Systems

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top