SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1699

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VINOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3363-2026 (O&M)

Date of decision: 05.02.2026 Vinod ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate with Mr. Atul Bhardwaj, Advocate with Mr. Viransh, Advocate and Ms. Hemlata, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl. A.G., Haryana for respondent No.1 and 7.

Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 6.

HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral)

1. Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari, for quashing the impugned order dated 07.11.2025 (Annexure P-2) qua the petitioner vide which the designation of the petitioner has been changed from Shift Attendant to ALM. Further prayer has been made to direct the respondents to correct the designation from ALM to Shift Attendant and to allow him to continue the work as Shift Attendant.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the petitioner joined respondent/Nigam as Shift Attendant on contractual basis on 12.01.2018 as is evident from Annexure P-1. On 07.11.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top