SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1707

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIRENDER KUMAR MANGOTRA SINCE DECEASED THROUGH LRS – Appellant
Versus
SNEH BHAGAT AND OTHERS – Respondent


(120) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:05.02.2026 VIRANDER KUMAR MANGOTRA ...Petitioner Vs.

SNEH BHAGAT AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Amit Dhawan, Advocate for the petitioner.

VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J. (Oral)

1. The present Civil Revision has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking to quash the impugned order dated 20.01.2026 (Annexure P-7), passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Jalandhar. By the said order, the learned trial court allowed an application filed by the respondent/plaintiff under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking recall of PW-2 for cross-examination, who, inadvertently, could not be examined during the original proceeding

2. Briefly stated, the respondent/plaintiff filed a suit seeking relief based on a Will. In the course of trial, PW-2, who was identified as a attesting witness, was examined to prove the authenticity and contents of the Will. The Court recorded his examination-in-chief; however, his cross-examination could not be completed at that time, as it was deferred at the specific request of the petitioner/def

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top