SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 1712

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMAR CHAND GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
OM WALI – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-733-2024 (O&M)

Decided on:-05.02.2026 Amar Chand Gupta ....Petitioner..

vs.

Om Wati ....Respondent.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Adarsh Jain, Senior Advocate with Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Tanmoy Gupta, Advocate, for the respondent.

*****

HARKESH MANUJA J. (Oral)

1. By way of present revision petition, challenge has been laid to an order dated 29.09.2023 passed by the learned Rent Controller at Faridabad.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the paper book.

3. As per the record, vide order dated 19.07.2023 passed by this Court in CR-2230-2021 titled as “Om Wati vs Amar Chand”, the prayer made by the respondent-landlady for leading additional evidence was allowed with the following observations:-

“6. The documents sought to produce would definitely help the Court in adjudicating the issue at hand as the title of the demised premises has been specifically denied and disputed by the respondent-tenant in the written statement. All the documents sought to produce are registered documents or the certified copies from the Court record, thus the veracity thereof c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top