IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SHANKAR PAL – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION CHANDIGARH – Respondent
##PAGE1##
CWP No. 3116 of 2026 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 3116 of 2026
Date of Decision:04.02.2026
Shankar Pal
….Petitioner
vs.
Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh and others
….Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Jagdeep Jaswal, Advocate
for the petitioner
Mr. Ritesh Watts, Advocate for
Mr. M.S.Batth, Advocate
for the respondents
***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227
of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to regularize
him as per policy dated 13.03.2015 framed by Chandigarh Administration
and followed by Municipal Corporation, Chandigarh.
2. The petitioner retired on 31.08.2025. He is claiming
regularization on the basis of judgments of Hon’ble Supreme Court in
Secretary, State of Karnataka & Others. vs. Umadevi & Others, (2006) 4
SCC 1 and Chandigarh Administration and another vs. Sampat Singh and
others, Civil Appeal No. 6779 of 2009. He is further claiming that Municipal
1 of 5
::: Downloaded on - 11-02-2026 05:49:57 :::
##PAGE2##CWP No. 3116 of 2026 -2-
Corporation has adopted regularization policy dated 13.03.2015 of
Chandigarh Administration.
3. The petitioner remained in service for more than 10 years after
passing of aforesaid judgments and policy framed by U.T. Administration.
He has already retired. He is claiming regularization after retirement on the
basis of aforesaid judgments as well as policy of Chandigarh Administration.
4. No hard-and-fast rule can be laid down as to when the High
Court should refuse to exercise its jurisdiction in favour of a party who
moves it after considerable delay and is otherwise guilty of laches.
Discretion must be exercised judiciously and reasonably. In the event that
the claim made by the applicant is legally sustainable, delay should be
condoned. Where illegality is manifest, cannot be sustained on the sole
ground of laches. When substantial justice and technical considerations are
pitted against each other, the cause of substantial justice deserves to be
preferred. State cannot deprive vested right because of a non-deliberate
delay.
5. A two Judge Bench of Supreme Court recently in ‘Mrinmoy
Maity Vs. Chhanda Koley and others’ 2024 SCC OnLine SC 551 has held
that High Court ought to dismiss petition on the ground of delay and laches
where there is no explanation of delay. An applicant who approaches the
Court belatedly or in the other words sleeps over his rights for a considerable
period ought not to be granted the extraordinary relief by writ Courts. Delay
defeats equity. High Court may refuse to invoke its writ jurisdiction if laxity
on the part of applicant has allowed the cause of action to drift away and
attempts are made to rekindle the lapsed cause of action. Multiple
2 of 5
::: Downloaded on - 11-02-2026 05:49:57 :::
##PAGE3##CWP No. 3116 of 2026 -3-
communications cannot create cause of action. The relevant extracts of the
judgment are reproduced as below:
“9. Having heard rival contentions raised and on
perusal of the facts obtained in the present case, we are of
the considered view that writ petitioner ought to have
been non-suited or in other words writ petition ought to
have been dismissed on the ground of delay and latches
itself. An applicant who approaches the court belatedly or
in other words sleeps over his rights for a considerable
period of time, wakes up from his deep slumber ought not
to be granted the extraordinary relief by the writ courts.
This Court time and again has held that delay defeats
equity. Delay or latches is one of the factors which should
be born in mind by the High Court while exercising
discretionary powers under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India. In a given case, the High Court
may refuse to invoke its extraordinary powers if laxity on
the part of the applicant to assert his right has allowed the
cause of action to drift away and attempts are made
subsequently to rekindle the lapsed cause of action.
10. The discretion to be exercised would be with care
a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.